Abstract: PO2125
Immunosuppression and Incident Cancer Risk in Older Kidney Transplant Recipients
Session Information
- Transplantation: Clinical - Underrecognized Risk Factors, Traditional Considerations, and Outcomes
November 04, 2021 | Location: On-Demand, Virtual Only
Abstract Time: 10:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Category: Transplantation
- 1902 Transplantation: Clinical
Authors
- Lentine, Krista L., Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States
- Caliskan, Yasar, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States
- Cheungpasitporn, Wisit, Mayo Clinic Minnesota, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
- Li, Ruixin, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States
- Schnitzler, Mark, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States
- McAdams-DeMarco, Mara, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
- Dharnidharka, Vikas R., Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, United States
- Ahn, JiYoon B., Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
- Bunnapradist, Suphamai, University of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, United States
- Bae, Sunjae, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
- Segev, Dorry L., Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
- Hess, Gregory, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
- Axelrod, David, The University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics Department of Pathology, Iowa City, Iowa, United States
Background
Cancer is a serious complication after kidney transplant (KTx), especially among older adults. The relationship of immunosuppression (ISx) to cancer in older KTx recipients is not well described.
Methods
We examined USRDS data (2005-2017) to explore associations of ISx regimens (within 6 mo) with new-onset cancer diagnoses >6 mo-to-5 yr post-KTx among Medicare-insured older (aged ≥ 65) adults. We used multivariate Cox regression with inverse propensity weighting to compare cancer risk vs. reference regimen of Thymoglobulin (TMG) or Alemtuzumab (ALEM) + Tacrolimus + antimetabolite + prednisone. Cancer diagnoses were also examined as time-dependent mortality predictors.
Results
Among 12567 older recipients, skin cancer incidence was higher with Tac+antimetabolite avoidance (10.3%) and CsA-based ISx (8.9%) compared to TMG/ALEM+triple ISx (6.4%; P=0.03 and P=0.002), while non-viral driven/non-skin cancer was less common with CsA-based ISx (10.9% vs 14.7%; P=0.03) (Fig. A). In adjusted models, IL2rAb+triple ISx was associated with lower skin cancer risk (aHR, 0.600.760.96). IL2rAb+steroid avoidance was associated with increased non-viral driven/non-skin cancer (aHR, 1.031.341.75), while CsA-based ISx predicted lower risk (aHR 0.590.750.95) (Fig. B). However, adjusted for time-varying impact of viral-driven (aHR 1.992.272.58) and non-viral driven/non-skin cancers (aHR 2.112.272.43), CsA use (aHR 1.121.241.37) predicted increased mortality in older recipients.
Conclusion
Although CsA-based ISx appears beneficial for non-skin cancer risk in older KTx recipients, this regimen is associated with increased mortality. Cancer risk is a consideration in tailoring ISx in older KTx recipients.
Funding
- NIDDK Support