ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Please note that you are viewing an archived section from 2021 and some content may be unavailable. To unlock all content for 2021, please visit the archives.

Abstract: PO2130

Chronic Active Antibody-Mediated Rejection: Response Rates to Treatment and Predictors of Graft Survival

Session Information

Category: Transplantation

  • 1902 Transplantation: Clinical

Authors

  • Aziz, Fahad, University of Wisconsin System, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
  • Parajuli, Sandesh, University of Wisconsin System, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
  • Garg, Neetika, University of Wisconsin System, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
  • Mohamed, Maha A., University of Wisconsin System, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
  • Mandelbrot, Didier A., University of Wisconsin System, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
  • Djamali, Arjang, University of Wisconsin System, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
Background

There is limited information on response rates to Rx and predictors of graft survival following chronic active antibody mediated rejection (cABMR).

Methods

We reviewed changes in kidney function, DSA, and histology in 3-month surveillance biopsies after initial therapy with pulse steroids/IVIG ± rituximab in kidney transplant recipients with cABMR between 01/2017 and 08/2020. Rx response was defined as 3M eGFR within 10% of baseline, proteinuria (UPC) decline by > 15%, DSA decline by > 50%, and MVI (ptc + g) score = 0.

Results

The study included 82 patients. 50% received rituximab. Mean time from Tx to cABMR was 10 yrs. Mean ptc, g, C4d, and cg Banff scores at index biopsy were 1.1, 2.1, 0.2, and 2, respectively. 47 patients (57%) had measurable circulating DSA. Mean eGFR and UPC were 38 mL/min and 1.6 g/g. Thirty (37%) patients lost their allograft during the mean follow-up of 2.4 yrs. At 3M, Rx with pulse steroids/IVIG was associated with eGFR, UPC, DSA, and MVI response in 27%, 49%, 7%, and 19% of patients. The addition of rituximab improved response to 66%, 61%, 20%, and 69%, respectively. On univariate analysis, rituximab use (HR=0.13, p=0.0001, 95%Cl 0.05 to 0.34) and a response in eGFR (HR=0.03, p=0.001, 95% Cl 0.004 to 0.26), UPC (HR=0.38, p=0.01, 95%Cl 0.18 to 0.82), and DSA (HR=0.11, p=0.004, 95%Cl 0.02 to 0.49) were associated with improved death-censored graft survival. Multivariate analysis only retained eGFR response (HR=0.12, p=0.01, 95%Cl 0.02 to 0.64).

Conclusion

Our study suggests that a return to baseline eGFR at 3M after initial biopsy is the best predictor of graft survival in patients with cABMR. Short-term histological and immunological response to treatment were not independently associated with graft survival.

Response Rate at Surveillance Biopsy
ResponseSteroids/IVIGSteroids/IVIG/Rituximabp-value 
eGFR11/41 (27%)
27/41 (66%)
0.004 
UPC20/41 (49%)
25/41 (61%)
0.3 
DSA4/21 (19%)
18/26 (69%)
0.007