ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Please note that you are viewing an archived section from 2021 and some content may be unavailable. To unlock all content for 2021, please visit the archives.

Abstract: TH-OR60

A Mate Kidney Analysis to Determine the Impact of Preemptive Transplantation on Outcomes of High Kidney Donor Profile Index Deceased Donor Transplants

Session Information

Category: Transplantation

  • 1902 Transplantation: Clinical

Authors

  • Gill, Justin, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • Kadatz, Matthew J., The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • Lan, James H., The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • Chang, Doris Tung, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • Gill, John S., The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • Gill, Jagbir, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Background

There is an inadequate supply of kidneys for transplant. The kidney donor profile index (KDPI) combines donor factors into a percentile that summarizes the likelihood of deceased donor transplant failure. High KDPI kidneys are frequently discarded. Pre-emptive transplantation is associated with improved patient and graft survival, but it is unknown if this benefit is preserved with high KDPI kidneys.

Methods

Using the SRTR database, N = 7,232 donors were identified where one donor kidney was transplanted pre-emptively (before the recipient required dialysis) and the other was used non-pre-emptively (after the recipient has initiated dialysis). We compared all cause graft loss (ACGL), death censored graft loss (DCGL), and death with function (DWF) between the pre-emptive and non-pre-emptive recipients using univariable and multivariable time to event analyses adjusted for differences in recipient factors.

Results

Pre-emptive transplantation was associated with improved outcomes of ACGL, DCGL, and DWF (Fig 1). These results were consistent in the subgroup where the donor KDPI was >= 91%. Furthermore, the risk of ACGL with a pre-emptive transplant from a KDPI >= 91% donor (HR: 1.65, CI: 1.51 – 1.81) was similar to the risk of ACGL from a non-pre-emptive transplant from a KDPI 51-80% donor (HR: 1.57 CI: 1-48 – 1.66) (Fig 2).

Conclusion

In this mate kidney analysis, outcomes after a pre-emptive transplant were superior compared to a non-pre-emptive transplant, even among kidneys from donors with very high KDPI. Pre-emptive transplantation of high KDPI kidneys is an opportunity to safely increase the number of kidney transplants from the limited supply of deceased donor kidneys.