ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Please note that you are viewing an archived section from 2021 and some content may be unavailable. To unlock all content for 2021, please visit the archives.

Abstract: FR-OR63

Effect of Avacopan, a Selective C5a Receptor Inhibitor, on Kidney Function in Patients with ANCA-Associated Vasculitis

Session Information

Category: CKD (Non-Dialysis)

  • 2102 CKD (Non-Dialysis): Clinical, Outcomes, and Trials

Authors

  • Jayne, David R.W., University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
  • Merkel, Peter A., University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Bekker, Pirow, ChemoCentryx Inc, San Carlos, California, United States
  • Bruchfeld, Annette, Linkopings universitet, Linkoping, Sweden
  • Geetha, Duvuru, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • Karras, Alexandre, Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
  • Niles, John, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Background

Patients with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis and renal disease have a poor prognosis. The effect of avacopan, an oral C5a receptor inhibitor, on renal function is described.

Methods

The ADVOCATE Phase 3 trial randomized patients to receive avacopan or prednisone taper on a background of either cyclophosphamide (followed by azathioprine) or rituximab. Primary endpoints were remission at Week 26 and sustained remission at Week 52. Secondary objectives included evaluation of kidney function.

Results

At Week 52, the difference in eGFR recovery in patients with eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and/or urinary abnormalities at baseline between avacopan and prednisone treatment groups was 5.5 mL/min/1.73 m2 (95% CI [1.4, 9.6], p<0.01) (Figure 1A). Improvement in eGFR with avacopan was most prominent in patients with eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 at baseline, when by week 52, the least squares mean (LSM) increase in eGFR was 13.7 (avacopan group) vs. 8.2 mL/min/1.73 m2 (prednisone group) (p<0.01) (Figure 1B).

Among patients with CKD Stage 4 at baseline: in the avacopan group (n=52), 26 (50%) improved 1 stage and 3 (5.8%) improved 2 stages; in the prednisone group (n=48), 21 (44%) improved 1 stage and 1 (2.1%) improved 2 stages (p=0.32). Avacopan was also associated with more rapid reduction in proteinuria and hematuria. Urinary albumin:creatinine ratio improved 40% within the first 4 weeks of treatment with avacopan vs. no change in the prednisone group (difference -40, 95% CI [-53, -22]).

Conclusion

In ADVOCATE, patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis in the avacopan group had greater recovery of kidney function compared to patients in the prednisone group, especially among patients with CKD Stage 4 and those with eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and/or urinary abnormalities at baseline.

Figure 1. Change in Renal Function Through Week 52

Funding

  • Commercial Support –