Abstract: FR-PO774
Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA (dd-cfDNA) in Kidney Transplant Recipients With Indication Biopsy: Results of a Prospective Single-Center Trial
Session Information
- Transplantation: Clinical - Biomarkers
November 04, 2022 | Location: Exhibit Hall, Orange County Convention Center‚ West Building
Abstract Time: 10:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Category: Transplantation
- 2002 Transplantation: Clinical
Authors
- Benning, Louise, Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany, Heidelberg, Germany
- Fink, Annette, Transplantation Immunology, Heidelberg Institute of Immunology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany, Heidelberg, Germany
- Kälble, Florian, Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany, Heidelberg, Germany
- Speer, Claudius, Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany, Heidelberg, Germany
- Nusshag, Christian, Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany, Heidelberg, Germany
- Zeier, Martin G., Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany, Heidelberg, Germany
- Süsal, Caner, Transplant Immunology Research Center of Excellence, Koç University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey, Istanbul, Turkey
- Morath, Christian, Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany, Heidelberg, Germany
- Tran, Thuong Hien, Transplantation Immunology, Heidelberg Institute of Immunology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany, Heidelberg, Germany
Background
Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is a marker of allograft injury in kidney transplant recipients (KTR). Little is known about the possible use of dd-cfDNA in evaluating response to anti-rejection treatment.
Methods
This far, we enrolled 84 KTR with indication biopsy between November 2020 and May 2022. Besides routine transplant laboratory, AlloSeq dd-cfDNA was quantified at time of biopsy and on days 7, 30, and 90 following biopsy.
Results
27/84 (32%) biopsies were graded as different types of rejection, whereof 19/27 (70%) showed borderline changes, 5/27 (19%) antibody-mediated rejections (ABMR) and 3/27 (11%) T-cellular mediated rejections (TCMR). Patients with signs of active rejection, including borderline changes, had significantly higher levels of dd-cfDNA at time of biopsy than patients without any signs for rejection, whereas estimated glomerular filtration rate did not differ significantly between the two groups (P<0.001 and P>0.99, respectively, Figure 1A). Patients with ABMR or TCMR showed highest dd-cfDNA levels with a median (IQR) of 2.6% (0.57–9.13) compared to 0.44% (0.20–1.10) in patients with borderline changes and 0.18% (0.11–0.50) in patients with no signs of rejection. dd-cfDNA levels decreased in most of these patients with ABMR or TCMR following initiation of anti-rejection therapy (pooled slope -0.02, Figure 1B). In patients with borderline changes and low levels of dd-cfDNA (<1%) at time of biopsy we see an increase in eGFR after initiation of corticosteroid pulse therapy, whereas patients with high levels of dd-cfDNA (≥1%) show subsequent eGFR decline (Figure 1C).
Conclusion
dd-cfDNA significantly discriminates active rejection at time of biopsy in KTR. Decreasing levels of dd-cfDNA may indicate treatment response in patients with ABMR and TCMR. dd-cfDNA may further help to identify borderline changes with favorable outcome from changes where additional therapy and closer monitoring is needed.
Funding
- Commercial Support – CareDX