ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Please note that you are viewing an archived section from 2022 and some content may be unavailable. To unlock all content for 2022, please visit the archives.

Abstract: FR-PO774

Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA (dd-cfDNA) in Kidney Transplant Recipients With Indication Biopsy: Results of a Prospective Single-Center Trial

Session Information

Category: Transplantation

  • 2002 Transplantation: Clinical

Authors

  • Benning, Louise, Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Fink, Annette, Transplantation Immunology, Heidelberg Institute of Immunology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Kälble, Florian, Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Speer, Claudius, Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Nusshag, Christian, Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Zeier, Martin G., Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Süsal, Caner, Transplant Immunology Research Center of Excellence, Koç University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Morath, Christian, Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Tran, Thuong Hien, Transplantation Immunology, Heidelberg Institute of Immunology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany, Heidelberg, Germany
Background

Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is a marker of allograft injury in kidney transplant recipients (KTR). Little is known about the possible use of dd-cfDNA in evaluating response to anti-rejection treatment.

Methods

This far, we enrolled 84 KTR with indication biopsy between November 2020 and May 2022. Besides routine transplant laboratory, AlloSeq dd-cfDNA was quantified at time of biopsy and on days 7, 30, and 90 following biopsy.

Results

27/84 (32%) biopsies were graded as different types of rejection, whereof 19/27 (70%) showed borderline changes, 5/27 (19%) antibody-mediated rejections (ABMR) and 3/27 (11%) T-cellular mediated rejections (TCMR). Patients with signs of active rejection, including borderline changes, had significantly higher levels of dd-cfDNA at time of biopsy than patients without any signs for rejection, whereas estimated glomerular filtration rate did not differ significantly between the two groups (P<0.001 and P>0.99, respectively, Figure 1A). Patients with ABMR or TCMR showed highest dd-cfDNA levels with a median (IQR) of 2.6% (0.57–9.13) compared to 0.44% (0.20–1.10) in patients with borderline changes and 0.18% (0.11–0.50) in patients with no signs of rejection. dd-cfDNA levels decreased in most of these patients with ABMR or TCMR following initiation of anti-rejection therapy (pooled slope -0.02, Figure 1B). In patients with borderline changes and low levels of dd-cfDNA (<1%) at time of biopsy we see an increase in eGFR after initiation of corticosteroid pulse therapy, whereas patients with high levels of dd-cfDNA (≥1%) show subsequent eGFR decline (Figure 1C).

Conclusion

dd-cfDNA significantly discriminates active rejection at time of biopsy in KTR. Decreasing levels of dd-cfDNA may indicate treatment response in patients with ABMR and TCMR. dd-cfDNA may further help to identify borderline changes with favorable outcome from changes where additional therapy and closer monitoring is needed.

Funding

  • Commercial Support –