ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Please note that you are viewing an archived section from 2019 and some content may be unavailable. To unlock all content for 2019, please visit the archives.

Abstract: TH-PO211

Crit-Line Monitoring Decreases Intradialytic Hypotension

Session Information

Category: Dialysis

  • 701 Dialysis: Hemodialysis and Frequent Dialysis

Authors

  • Harford, Antonia, Dialysis Clinic Inc, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
  • Whittle, Donna D., Dialysis Clinic Inc, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
  • Young, Michael A., Dialysis Clinic Inc, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
  • Paine, S., Dialysis Clinic Inc, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
  • Jiang, Huan, Dialysis Clinic Inc, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
  • Gul, Ambreen, Dialysis Clinic Inc, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
  • Zager, Philip, Dialysis Clinic Inc, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
Background

Published clinical studies on the use of blood volume monitoring to guide ultrafiltration in hemodialysis (HD) have had mixed results. We conducted a continuous quality improvement (CQI) project to assess the impact of Crit-Line monitoring during routine care in a chronic HD facility operated by a large, non-profit dialysis provider. We postulated that Crit-Line monitoring would decrease intradialytic hypotension & hospitalization due to fluid overload.

Methods

After a 6-month baseline period, we conducted 1 month staff training on Crit-Line use, followed by a 2nd 6-month period with Crit-Line monitoring with each HD. 29 HD patients contributed a mean of 62 & 61 treatments to the baseline & Crit-Line periods, respectively. Mean & 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for age & vintage were 62.6 (57.6, 67.6) & 4.7 (2.2, 7.2) years, respectively. Males & diabetics comprised 72% & 38% of the patients, respectively. Hypotension was defined as systolic blood pressure (BP) < 100 mmHg or symptoms associated with a drop in BP. Dialysate temperature & composition did not change significantly between the 2 time periods. We used Poisson regression models, adjusted for sex, diabetes, vintage & BMI, to compare treatment related events including cramping, symptomatic hypotension, & leaving treatment > 1 kg from estimated dry weight (EDW) & hospitalization during the baseline period & the 6-months in which Crit-Line monitoring was used.

Results

Intradialytic hypotension was significantly lower during Crit-Line monitoring (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.2, 0.7). Other adverse events including all-cause & cardiovascular hospitalization rates did not differ across the 2 time periods (see table).

Conclusion

Crit-Line use was associated with a statistically significant decrease in the frequency of intra-dialytic hypotension; however there was no association with hospitalization. Well trained staff are essential to the optimal use of Crit-Line monitoring.

Funding

  • Commercial Support –