ASN's Mission

ASN leads the fight to prevent, treat, and cure kidney diseases throughout the world by educating health professionals and scientists, advancing research and innovation, communicating new knowledge, and advocating for the highest quality care for patients.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on Twitter

Kidney Week

Abstract: FR-PO631

A Validated Anion Gap Threshold for High Anion Gap Metabolic Acidosis

Session Information

Category: Fluid and Electrolytes

  • 902 Fluid and Electrolytes: Clinical

Authors

  • Chionh, Chang Yin, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
  • Yeon, Wenxiang, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
  • Poh, Cheng boon, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
  • Koduri, Sreekanth, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
  • Roy, Debajyoti M., Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore

Group or Team Name

  • Changi REnal MEdicine REsearch (CREMERE) Group
Background

The anion gap (AG), calculated by AG = [Na+]–[Cl]–[HCO3], is often used to screen for acid-base disorders but cut-off levels used by clinical texts were based on empirical data.

We recently sampled 300 healthy volunteers and the mean AG was 13±2mEq/L (manuscript in preparation). The proposed reference range (±2SD; central 95th percentile) was 9-17mEq/L. This study was to define a cut-off value for high AG metabolic acidosis (HAGMA).

Methods

Data from ICU patients from a prior study was used. Blood samples were classified into 2 groups: no HAGMA, or HAGMA present due to lactic acidosis, ketosis, citrate toxicity or severe uremia. The association of AG and HAGMA was tested by the Mann-Whitney U test. ROC analysis of AG was undertaken with optimal cut-off determined by Youden index.

Results

From 1,545 blood samples, 400 had adequate data. The median age was 64.7yrs, weight 60.1kg, 31.6% were females and 170 had HAGMA. With HAGMA, median AG was 19mEq/L (IQR 17–22) vs 15mEq/L (IQR 13–17) without HAGMA (P<0.001).

AG has an AUC of 0.802 and the optimal cut-off was ≥17mEq/L (Fig. 1). The false negative rate (FNR) was 19.5%; false positive rate (FPR) 32.1%.

Other AG thresholds were analysed (Table 1). As HAGMA may be life-threatening, a lower FNR is desired. The best FNR of 13.2% was with AG ≥13mEq/L, corresponding to mean AG of healthy persons, but FPR increased to 53.0%.

Conclusion

The recommended AG cut-off for HAGMA is ≥13mEq/L. This provides the best sensitivity but at the expense of specificity. As false negatives can still occur, acid-base status should be evaluated clinically, aided by repeated measurements of AG.

Table 1: Sensitivity & Specificity of AG Thresholds for HAGMA
AG cut-offSpecificityFalse PositiveSensitivityFalse Negative
≥13 (Population Mean)20.0%53.0%53.0%13.2%
≥15 (Population Mean + 1SD)44.3%45.9%45.9%15.7%
≥17 (Population Mean + 2SD)73.5%32.1%32.1%19.5%

Fig. 1: ROC curve of AG for HAGMA