ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Please note that you are viewing an archived section from 2019 and some content may be unavailable. To unlock all content for 2019, please visit the archives.

Abstract: FR-PO479

Controlling High Pre-Dialysis Serum Total Carbon Dioxide Concentration with Low Dialysate Flow Systems During Frequent Nocturnal Hemodialysis

Session Information

Category: Dialysis

  • 701 Dialysis: Hemodialysis and Frequent Dialysis

Authors

  • Leypoldt, J. Ken, Nalecz Institute of Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
  • Kraus, Michael A., NxStage Medical, Inc, Fishers, Indiana, United States
  • Collins, Allan J., NxStage Medical, Inc., Lawrence, Massachusetts, United States
Background

Although use of low dialysate bicarbonate concentration ([bicarbonate]) during in-center, thrice weekly in-center hemodialysis (ICHD) is a common strategy to control high serum predialysis serum total carbon dioxide concentration ([TCO2]), such an approach is not always possible with commercial lactate dialysates. We used clinical data in patients who transferred from ICHD using bicarbonate dialysate to 6 times per week hemodialysis during the FREEDOM Study and the H+ mobilization model (Sargent et al, Semin Dial 31:468-78, 2018) to calculate the effect of using 30 L versus 60 L of dialysate volume per treatment to reduce [TCO2] during frequent nocturnal hemodialysis (NHD).

Methods

The H+ mobilization model was first used to simulate ICHD treatments using dialysate [bicarbonate] of 34, 37 & 40 mEq/L at [TCO2] of 22, 24 & 26 mEq/L to calculate a weekly acid generation rate. Assuming a constant weekly acid generation rate, patients were assumed transferred to NHD with treatment (Tx) frequencies of 3.5 (every other day), 4 & 5 times per week and dialysate volumes per Tx of 30 L & 60 L. Blood flow rate was assumed as 300 mL/min, Tx time of 420 min, and dialysate [lactate] was 40 mEq/L during NHD.

Results

Summary results are tabulated. Lowering dialysate volume per Tx from 60 to 30 L resulted in lower [TCO2] by approximately 2-3 mEq/L.

Conclusion

Patients who may achieve excessively high [TCO2] during NHD using lactate as dialysate buffer can use of 30 L instead of 60 L per treatment to reduce [TCO2]. Such reductions in dialysate volume during NHD are not expected to substantially lower dialysis adequacy.

[TCO2] During NHD (mEq/L)
 3.5 Tx/wk4 Tx/wk5 Tx/wk
[TCO2] during ICHDDV=30 LDV=60 LDV=30 LDV=60 LDV=30 LDV=60 L
22202321242426
24212423252527
26232625272728

All values averaged during ICHD treatments (Tx) using dialysate [bicarbonate] of 34, 37 & 40 mEq/L; the standard deviation of all values was 1 mEq/L. (DV denotes dialysate volume per treatment.)

Funding

  • Commercial Support –