ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Please note that you are viewing an archived section from 2019 and some content may be unavailable. To unlock all content for 2019, please visit the archives.

Abstract: TH-PO999

Impact of Sparsentan on Quality of Life (QoL) in Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) Patients in DUET: An Interim Analysis

Session Information

Category: Glomerular Diseases

  • 1203 Glomerular Diseases: Clinical, Outcomes, and Trials

Authors

  • Trachtman, Howard, NYU School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States
  • Hogan, Jonathan J., University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Ferguson, Beatrice, Retrophin, Inc., San Diego, California, United States
  • Komers, Radko, Retrophin, Inc., San Diego, California, United States
Background

FSGS has been shown to impair patients’ (pts) QoL. DUET, a phase 2, randomized, active-control study, examined QoL in pts with FSGS.

Methods

In the 8-week randomized double-blind treatment period (DB), pts received sparsentan (SPAR) or irbesartan (IRB), after which all randomized pts who continued in an open-label extension received SPAR (SPAR:SPAR or IRB:SPAR, respectively). The SF-36 questionnaire was administered to adults at baseline (BL), Week 8, Week 48 and Week 144. Norm-based scoring was used for the physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) component scores (mean±SD).

Results

Seventy-three patients were randomized to SPAR and 36 to IRB with a mean baseline UP/C of 3.61 and 3.12 g/g, respectively, and median eGFR of 73.4 and 65.1 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. There were no clinically meaningful differences between the SPAR and IRB groups in the cross-sectional PCS or MCS at BL and Week 8. The mean change from BL to Week 8 between the SPAR and IRB groups for PCS (p=0.5103) and MCS (p=0.8725) did not differ. Importantly, there were no meaningful changes over time during the open-label extension in PCS or MCS from BL to Week 48, or Week 144 both in SPAR:SPAR and IRB:SPAR (Table).

Conclusion

Using the SF-36, the physical and mental QoL component scores in DUET were similar in SPAR- and IRB-treated patients during the DB. QoL parameters remained stable over time (2 years) in participants electing to remain on long-term open-label treatment with SPAR regardless of original randomization to SPAR or IRB and were not adversely affected by dual blockade of the AT1 and ETA receptors.

Table. Cross-Sectional Mean±SD for PCS and MCS
SF-36 DimensionSPAR:SPARIRB:SPAR
Week 0
n=53
Week 8
n=56
Week 48
n=49
Week 144
n=32
Week 0
n=25
Week 8
n=28
Week 48
n=48
Week 144
n=19
PCS, mean±SD49±849±949±949±950±750±753±553±6
MCS, mean±SD50±1050±952±1052±950±1150±1052±650±7

Funding

  • Commercial Support – Retrophin, Inc., San Diego, CA