ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Please note that you are viewing an archived section from 2019 and some content may be unavailable. To unlock all content for 2019, please visit the archives.

Abstract: SA-PO720

Clinical Verification of Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratio Instead of 24-Hour Urinary Protein Evaluated the Different Levels of Proteinuria in Children

Session Information

Category: Pathology and Lab Medicine

  • 1602 Pathology and Lab Medicine: Clinical

Authors

  • Huang, Yanjie, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China
  • Yang, Xiaoqing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China
Background

To evaluate the correlation and consistency between urine protein/creatinine ratio (UPCR) and 24 hour urinary protein (24hUP) in children, and to determine cutoff values of UPCR relative to 24hUP at 150mg(>150mg is pathological proteinuria) and 50mg/kg (>50mg/kg is nephrotic-range proteinuria) respectively.

Methods

370 children were enrolled, including 85 normal children, 109 Henoch-Schönlein purpura nephritis, 167 nephrotic syndrome, 5 IgA nephropathy, and 4 lupus nephritis. These patients were divided into three groups: normal group: 24hUP≤150mg, n =85; non-nephrotic range proteinuria group: 150mg<24hUP≤50mg/kg, n =120; nephrotic-range proteinuria group: 24hUP>50mg/kg, n =165. Clinical symptoms and laboratory examimation data were collected. The correlation between UPCR and 24hUP were evaluated by spearman correlation analysis. The consistency between UPCR and 24hUP was analyzed by Bland-Altman technique. The cutoff values of UPCR in predicting non-nephrotic range proteinuria group and nephrotic-range proteinuria were determined using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve, respectively.

Results

UPCR was positively correlated with 24hUP (r =0.885, P<0.01). Bland-altman diagrams showed that UPCR and 24hUP had good consistency, and >95% spots of UPCR and 24hUP were within the 95% consistency area. Relative to 24hUP (150mg), the cutoff value (0.23g/g Cr) with the highest sensitivity (92.8%) and specificity (92.9%) was close to the UPCR>0.2g/g Cr proposed by American rheumatic society in 2006 as the diagnositic standard of pathological proteinuria. Relative to 24hUP (50mg/kg), the cutoff value (2.09g/g Cr) with the highest sensitivity (94.5%) and specificity (88.6%) was close to the UPCR>2.0g/g Cr proposed in 2012 KDIGO guidelines as the diagnositic standard of nephrotic syndrome and nephrotic-range proteinuria.

Conclusion

There are good correlation and consistency between UPCR and 24hUP. UPCR can be used to evaluate the different levels of proteinuria in children.