ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Please note that you are viewing an archived section from 2020 and some content may be unavailable. To unlock all content for 2020, please visit the archives.

Abstract: PO0631

Study on the Mechanism of Microinflammation with Uremia Caused by Lactobacillus Activation of Intestinal Macrophages by Mincle

Session Information

  • CKD Mechanisms - 2
    October 22, 2020 | Location: On-Demand
    Abstract Time: 10:00 AM - 12:00 PM

Category: CKD (Non-Dialysis)

  • 2103 CKD (Non-Dialysis): Mechanisms

Authors

  • Sun, Lingshuang, First Affiliated Hospital of Medicine School, Xi’an Jiaotong University,, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
  • Jiang, Hongli, First Affiliated Hospital of Medicine School, Xi’an Jiaotong University,, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
Background

My previous studies have found that Intestinal macrophages in the uremic rats are polarized towards a proinflammatory phenotype and assist bacterial translocation resulting in microinflammation. However, it is still unclear what kind of mechanism activates intestinal macrophages in uremia.

Methods

Male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into two groups: sham, uremia. Immunochemistry was used to analyze the expression of macrophage-inducible C-type lectin (Mincle). RT-PCR and western blot were employed to assess the mRNA and protein expression of toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4).

Results

Our RCT study found that the number of Lactobacilli in the intestines of patients with end-stage diabetic nephropathy was significantly higher than that in non-diabetic patients. The plasma levels of endotoxin, CRP, IL-6, and TNF-a in the uremia group were greater than those in the sham group (p>0.05)(Table 1).Compared with the sham group, the uremia group exhibited macrophages with higher staining intensities for Mincle and higher mRNA and protein expression of TLR4(Figure1-2).

Conclusion

The solution to this scientific problem will not only clarify the molecular mechanism of intestinal bacteria in controlling the activation of intestinal macrophages, but also to clarify the micro-inflammation state of uremia.

Table 1. Body weight, hematocrit, and blood chemistry results
Group (n = 10)Body weight (g)Creatinine (µmol/L)Urea (mmol/L)Endotoxin (Eu/mL)CRP(mg/mL)IL-6(pg/mL)TNF-α (pg/mL)
Sham560.4 ±16.631.5 ±6.76.05 ±0.850.016±0.0052.48 ±0.2818.26 ±3.7220.9 ±0.28
Uremia516.6 ±14.595.7 ±35.6*18.10 ±8.50*0.033 ±0.009*5.2 ±0.77*31.07 ±10.06*30.4 ± 7.73*

Data are presented as the mean ±SD. *p < 0.05 vs. the sham group

Funding

  • Government Support - Non-U.S.