ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Please note that you are viewing an archived section from 2019 and some content may be unavailable. To unlock all content for 2019, please visit the archives.

Abstract: TH-PO1116

Predicting Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant Outcomes: Comparing KDRI/KDPI with Machine Learning

Session Information

Category: Transplantation

  • 1902 Transplantation: Clinical

Author

  • Pahl, Eric, OmniLife, Coralville, Iowa, United States
Background

Kidney transplantation is an effective cure for patients suffering from end-stage renal disease. Kidney transplantation is cost-effective, provides a significant survival benefit, and improves the quality of life for patients. One limitation on kidney transplantation is the appropriate assessment of donor quality, for which several indices have been created.

Methods

Machine learning methods (MLM) were compared to kidney donor risk index (KDRI aka KDPI) for the ability to predict graft failure by 12, 24, and 36 months after deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT). The MLM model, an ensemble of thousands of randomly generated decision trees, was trained with the same data initially used to develop KDRI.

Results

An MLM trained with the readily available recipient and donor variables performs significantly better than KDRI/KDPI when predicting graft failure by 12, 24, and 36 months after DDKT. When comparing equal prediction failure rates of 10%, MLM successfully predicted 126% more successful DDKTs (an additional 2,148) than KDRI/KDPI from 1995-2005. Over the entire ROC curve, the MLM performed statistically significantly better c-statistic than KDRI/KDPI in all predictions.

Conclusion

Using MLM, many high-KDRI kidney offers resulted in thousands of successful patient outcomes without increasing risk of predicted graft failure. The MLM provided a significant improvement over KDRI for the assessment of kidney offers and give clinical professionals an improved basis for making the critical decisions. This work lays the foundation for future MLM in organ transplantation and describes the steps to measure, analyze, and validate future models.