ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Please note that you are viewing an archived section from 2019 and some content may be unavailable. To unlock all content for 2019, please visit the archives.

Abstract: SA-PO1148

Impact of Treatment of Borderline Rejection on Subsequent T Cell-Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Session Information

Category: Transplantation

  • 1902 Transplantation: Clinical

Authors

  • Kalra, Kartik, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Munjal, Ripudaman Singh, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Tandukar, Srijan, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Cashion, Winn, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Owoyemi, Itunu O., University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Sood, Puneet, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Hariharan, Sundaram, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Wu, Christine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Mehta, Rajil B., University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Background

The optimal management of borderline rejection (BR) seen in the early post-transplant period is unclear. Studies have shown that BR is associated with higher Subclinical or Clinical T-Cell Mediated Rejection (TCMR) within 1 year post-transplant. However, the role of steroids in attenuating this risk is unclear. We performed this study to evaluate the impact of treating BR with steroids on subsequent development of TCMR.

Methods

Adult kidney transplant recipients (N=183) with Subclinical or Clinical BR in the first 3 months post-transplant based on Banff 2005 criteria were divided into two groups: (i) No treatment group (N=143), and (ii) Steroid treatment group (N=40). We excluded prior TCMR, Antibody mediated rejection (AMR) and BK virus nephritis. All the patients with BR had their maintenance immunosuppression (MIS) optimized. All patients were induced with thymoglobulin (97%) or basiliximab (3%) and a rapid steroid taper over 5 days per protocol. Standard MIS was with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. Recipient, donor and transplant variables were similar between the groups. The subsequent development of subclinical and clinical TCMR over the course of the first year was followed.

Results

Refer to Results Table

Conclusion

Treatment of BR in early post-transplant period with steroids was not associated with lower rates of TCMR at 1-year post transplant. However, steroid dose varied in our study from 1 to 3 doses of methyprednisolone. Further studies with uniform dosing of steroids are required to establish definite treatment strategies for BR.

Results
 T Cell Mediated Rejection (Clinical or Sub Clinical)Totalp-value
Treatment with SteroidsYesNo0.52
Yes102939
No30114144
Total40143183