ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Please note that you are viewing an archived section from 2019 and some content may be unavailable. To unlock all content for 2019, please visit the archives.

Abstract: FR-OR122

Tissue Resident Memory T Cells in Mouse Renal Transplantation

Session Information

Category: Transplantation

  • 1901 Transplantation: Basic

Authors

  • Abou Daya, Khodor, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Oberbarnscheidt, Martin H., University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Lakkis, Fadi G., University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Background

The newly identified tissue resident subset of memory T cells (TRM) provides immune surveillance in the tissue and first response against infections. They are functionally, transcriptionally, and phenotypically distinct from circulating effector and central memory T cells. The role of TRM in transplantation is unknown. In this study, we investigated the formation and function of TRM in a mouse kidney transplantation model.

Methods

Syngeneic B6 or allogeneic (B6xBALB/c) F1.ova kidneys were transplanted to B6 recipients and 1 million OT-I effector T cells were transferred on day 2. Graft, blood, bone marrow, SLO, and liver tissues were harvested 4 and 8 wks after transplantation. Serum creatinine was measured using i-Stat analyzer. TRM were identified phenotypically as CD44hiCD62LlowCD69+ CD103+/- cells after excluding in vivo labeled T cells. OT-I and polyclonal TRM were transcriptional characterized using scRNAseq. We tested TRM residency in the graft by performing parabiosis between 4-wk transplanted CD45.1 B6 mice that contained OT-I effectors and CD45.2 B6 parabionts that had received F1.ova kidneys but no OT-I. Whether TRM are sufficient for rejection was tested in a re-transplantation model using splenectomized LTBR-/- mice as secondary recipients of F1.ova grafts containing TRM. Depletion experiments are underway to further establish causal relationship between TRM and rejection.

Results

Mean serum creatinine (mg/dl) was significantly higher in allogeneic vs syngeneic group at wk 8 (0.8 vs 0.2, p<0.05). Graft histology showed mixed acute and chronic rejection in the allogeneic group. Flow analysis of allograft cells demonstrated TRM cells among OT-I and endogenous T cell populations at 4 & 8 wks. The OT-I population was exclusively TRM phenotype by flow and scRNAseq, rapidly produced IFNg upon re-stimulation, and was not detected anywhere else. There was no significant difference in mean number of OT-Is between wk 4 and wk 8 (125k vs 79k, p=0.94). OT-I T cells could not be detected in the parabiont kidney graft or tissues or in the secondary host outside the re-transplanted kidney, indicating that the TRM are indeed resident in the graft and do not re-circulate. Chronic rejection progressed in re-transplanted kidneys that harbored TRM.

Conclusion

Our findings show that donor-specific TRM form in kidney allografts, are functional, and could contribute to rejection.

Funding

  • Other NIH Support