ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Please note that you are viewing an archived section from 2019 and some content may be unavailable. To unlock all content for 2019, please visit the archives.

Abstract: TH-PO1152

Use of Expanded Criteria Donors for Pediatric Kidney Transplantation in the United States

Session Information

Category: Transplantation

  • 1902 Transplantation: Clinical

Authors

  • Kizilbash, Sarah J., University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
  • McEwen, Scott T., University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
  • Evans, Michael David, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
  • Chavers, Blanche M., University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Background

The use of marginal kidneys for transplantation has increased in the recent years to expand the deceased donor pool. Transplant outcomes associated with the use of expanded criteria donors (ECD) in children are unknown.

Methods

We used the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients to identify all pediatric (<18 years at transplant) deceased donor kidney transplants that were performed in the US using ECD (donors older than 60 years or older than 50 years with co-morbidities) between 1987-2017.

Results

Our final cohort included 96 ECD and 375 non-ECD recipients. The demographic and baseline characteristics of donors and recipients are presented in table 1. ECD donors were older (58.4 vs. 25.1 years; p<0.001), and less likely to be males (33.3 vs. 62.4%; p<0.001). Compared with non-ECD recipients, ECD recipients were at significantly higher risk of delayed graft function (aOR: 3.2; 95% CI: 1.8 5.6; p< 0.001), graft failure (aHR: 1.6; 95% CI: 1.2 2.1; p 0.001) and mortality (aHR: 1.6; 95% CI: 1.02–2.3; p 0.01). Five-year acute rejection free survival tended to be lower in ECD vs. non-ECD recipients (24.3 vs. 34.4%; p 0.06).

Conclusion

ECD kidney transplants in children are associated with higher risks of delayed graft function, graft failure and mortality compared with matched non-ECD recipients. We recommend that kidneys from ECD donors not be considered for pediatric candidates.

Demographic and baseline characteristics of kidney transplant recipients and donors
VariablesExpanded criteria donor recipients
N = 96
Non-expanded criteria donor recipients
N = 375
p value
Recipients age at transplant (years)
Mean (SD)
13.4 (4.3)12.7 (4.4)0.18
Recipient gender n (%)
Male
51 (53.1)212 (56.5)0.63
Recipient race n (%)
White
Black
Other
57 (59.4)
34 (35.4)
5 (5.2)
235 (62.7)
117 (31.2)
23 (6.1)
0.92
Pre-emptive transplant n (%)13 (13.5)62 (16.5)0.58
Delayed graft function n (%)35 (36.5)66 (17.6)<0.001
Age at donation (years)
Mean (SD)
58.4 (5.6)25.1 (14.4)<0.001
Donor gender n (%)
Male
32 (33.3)234 (62.4)<0.001
Donor race n (%)
White
Black
Other
84 (87.5)
9 (9.4)
3 (3.1)
311 (82.9)
54 (14.4)
10 (2.7)
0.06
KDPI
Mean (SD)
82.5 (11.4)31.3 (23.2)<0.001