ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Please note that you are viewing an archived section from 2023 and some content may be unavailable. To unlock all content for 2023, please visit the archives.

Abstract: FR-PO086

Evaluation of Risk Stratification for AKI: A Comparative Analysis of EKFC, 2009, and 2021 CKD-EPI Glomerular Filtration Estimating Equations

Session Information

Category: Acute Kidney Injury

  • 101 AKI: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Prevention

Authors

  • Cho, Jeongmin, Seoul National University Hospital, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Koh, Jung Hun, Seoul National University Hospital, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Kim, Yaerim, Keimyung University Daegu Dongsan Hospital, Daegu, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Kim, Dong Ki, Seoul National University Hospital, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Park, Sehoon, Seoul National University Hospital, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
Background

The adoption of the 2021 CKD-EPIcr equation for glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation provided race-free eGFR calculation. We aimed to evaluate the differences in acute kidney injury (AKI) risk discrimination power according to 2009 and 2021 CKD-EPIcr, and EKFC equations.

Methods

We performed a retrospective observational study within a tertiary hospital from 2011 to 2021. AKI was defined according to KDIGO serum creatinine criteria. GFR estimates were calculated by three GFR estimating equations: 2009 and 2021 CKD-EPIcr, and EKFC. AKI risk discriminative performances were evaluated with area under receiver operator curves (AUROC) and net reclassification improvement.

Results

A total of 187,139 individuals, including 27,447 (14.7%) of AKI and 159,692 (85.3%) of control, were enrolled. In multivariable regression prediction model, 2009 CKD-EPIcr model (0.7583 [0.755 – 0.7617]) showed superior performance in AKI prediction than 2021 CKD-EPIcr (0.7564 [0.7531 – 0.7597], <0.001) or EKFC model in AUROC (0.7577 [0.7543 – 0.761], <0.001). In reclassification of AKI, 2021 CKD-EPIcr and EKFC models showed a worse classification performance than 2009 CKD-EPIcr model. (-7.24 [-8.21 – -6.21], -2.38 [-2.72 – -1.97] %).

Conclusion

Regarding AKI risk stratification, the 2009 CKD-EPIcr equation showed better discriminative performances compared to 2021 CKD-EPIcr equation.

Figure 1. Performance of GFR estimating equations in classifying AKI using Multivariable ROC-AUC

Figure 2. Net reclassification improvement for AKI (multivariable-model 2)